Opened 11 years ago

Closed 11 years ago

Last modified 10 years ago

#42 closed defect (invalid)

Install from trunk svn checkout (896) on OS X 10.6 cause error

Reported by: ssteiner Owned by: steve steiner
Priority: minor Milestone: 2.5
Component: Other Version: 2.4.2b2
Keywords: installation, os x, 10.6, make docs, docutils Cc:


# sudo python install

everything goes fine up to:

byte-compiling /Library/Python?/2.6/site-packages/ftputil/ to lrucache.pyc running install_data creating /System/Library/Frameworks/Python?.framework/Versions/2.6/doc copying ftputil.txt -> /System/Library/Frameworks/Python?.framework/Versions/2.6/doc error: can't copy 'ftputil.html': doesn't exist or not a regular file

I am reporting this just to make sure it's recorded. I'l track it down right now and supply a patch/fix as soon as I find it.

Change History (6)

comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by ssteiner

The html file, which is present in the ftputil-2.4.2b2.tar.gz file, is missing from svn checkout for some reason.

I guess the "cure" is to just restore the file...

comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by ssteiner

Resolution: invalid
Status: newclosed

This error is caused by the fact that bdist or sdist must be run to generate the HTML files.

I'm used to libraries being able to be run with develop which just links back to the current directory in site-packages so the library can be "installed" with an svn checkout being the 'library'.

Running python bdist or sdist generates the file and the library installs fine.

Sorry for the line noise...

comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by schwa

Keywords: make docs docutils added

Yes, I haven't included the HTML files because they can be generated automatically from the .txt files. If you just want to make the HTML files, you can run make docs if you have docutils installed.

Apart from that, your point in the previous comment in my opinion is a good one. A way to achive the out-of-the-box installation might be to let generate the HTML docs if they don't exist, but that in turn would still require docutils. On the other hand, just adding the HTML docs to the Subversion repository conceals the presumably automated relationship between the formats and leads to inconsistent documentation files if someone changes a text file without re-generating the HTML.

I'll think about it. What do you think?

comment:4 Changed 11 years ago by schwa

I've checked in [897] which contains a check in If one or more of the HTML files is missing on attempted installation, prints a message to run "make docs" and exits. I think that's reasonable enough.

I'll revoke the change before I release 2.4.2, and include the code afterwards. It would be embarrassing to make something I haven't thought of fail because of such a change. And I don't want to make another beta release.

So please use revision 897 specifically,

$ svn up -r897

and test it. :)

comment:5 Changed 11 years ago by schwa

I re-added the patch in [2c47ed8955d1]. The Subversion revision which used to be 897 is now [81517281879a].

comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by schwa

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.